
Tova Bennet
Biträdande universitetslektor

An integrated model for criminal responsibility in action: How Swedish criminal law operates without an insanity defence
Författare
Summary, in English
In nearly all criminal justice systems, a defendant’s severe mental disorder can trigger special rules that excuse or exempt the defendant. Swedish criminal law adopts an alternative approach that considers all defendants to be equal in terms of accountability, or capacity for responsibility, and lacks any rules that excuse or exempt a defendant with a severe mental disorder or disability. This paper presents the first
comprehensive study of how Swedish criminal law functions without an insanity defence. The analysis focuses on the legal assessment of mens rea and offers observations regarding the Swedish model that are of particular relevance for discussions concerning the potential and pitfalls of an ‘‘integrated’’ model for criminal responsibility.
comprehensive study of how Swedish criminal law functions without an insanity defence. The analysis focuses on the legal assessment of mens rea and offers observations regarding the Swedish model that are of particular relevance for discussions concerning the potential and pitfalls of an ‘‘integrated’’ model for criminal responsibility.
Avdelning/ar
- Straffrätt
- Rätt och utsatthet
- Health Law
- Juridiska institutionen
Publiceringsår
2024-05-08
Språk
Engelska
Publikation/Tidskrift/Serie
Criminal Law Forum
Dokumenttyp
Artikel i tidskrift
Förlag
Springer Nature
Ämne
- Law
Nyckelord
- Insanity defence
- Integrated model
- Criminal responsibility
- mental disorder
- Forensic psychiatry
- Straffrätt
Aktiv
Published
Forskningsgrupp
- Criminal Law
- Law and Vulnerabilities
- Health Law
ISBN/ISSN/Övrigt
- ISSN: 1572-9850